Top tips for preparing a dilapidations claim

While the tools needed to gather evidence for a claim have evolved considerably in the past few years, they will of course vary depending on the specific situation.

Carrying the correct kit

Abandoned city building

Related article

MEES may benefit tenants in dilapidations claims

What evidence do you need to collect?

It is important for you to collect evidence of any breaches of covenant, not only with the building fabric but also aspects of the property such as its mechanical and electrical systems, fixtures and chattels. Armed with the evidence, you can then call in any specialist testing you may need.

There is frequent debate as to whether the tenant is obliged to provide this information; however, without it there is often ambiguity. Gathering the best records will allow greater certainty and quicker settlements.

How best to present a claim

When presenting a dilapidations claim, it is important to ensure that it is clear, comprehensive and well organised. You may collect a lot of data, but you don't need to present it all.

In one case I worked on, for example, I took over from a landlord's surveyor who had spent 36 hours taking tens of thousands of photographs, and who had produced a claim of 4,000 items. I managed to get that down to fewer than 100 items that couldn't be argued, which led to a quick settlement just ahead of trial.

A coherent claim that clearly outlines what you are requesting should include the following.

In particular, take care with your use of terminology. The terms 'without prejudice' and 'subject to contract' have specific legal meanings and should be used correctly to avoid misunderstandings, facilitating negotiation and protecting both parties until a final agreement is reached and a formal contract is signed.

'Without prejudice' is used to indicate that any communication or offer relating to a claim is being made in a way that is non-binding. That communication or offer cannot therefore be referred to in court or in any other legal proceedings. However, although this does promote open discussions, it can be overused by surveyors.

'Subject to contract' meanwhile is a term used to indicate that any agreement reached between the parties during the negotiation process is not legally binding until a formal contract is signed.